Sunday, February 3, 2013
Libyan Intelligence Service CIA-MI6 Extraordinary Rendition Documents September 12, 2011 in Central Intelligence Agency, Libya These documents concerning CIA rendition of terrorism suspects, with the help of the UK, were recovered from the offices of Libyan intelligence and published by Human Rights Watch. Libyan Intelligence Service Extraordinary Rendition Documents 4 pages Secret Releasable Libya Only 1999-2004 Download Tags: Central Intelligence Agency, Extraordinary rendition, Libya, MI6, Secret, United Kingdom 4 Comments » Related Material From the Archive: Documents Detail CIA, MI6 Relationship With Qaddafi Italy seeks jail for US spies in rendition trial U.S. Secret Service Requests Removal of Documents from Public Intelligence Libyan Rebels Reportedly Capture British SAS Team U.S. Asks Saudi Arabia to Supply Weapons to Libyan Rebels NATO Commander Discusses “Flickers” of Al-Qaeda Among Libyan Rebels Billions in Libyan Oil Money Held by Western Banks Like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, HSBC, Societe Generale Libyan Rebel Photos
Libyan Intelligence Service CIA-MI6 Extraordinary Rendition Documents
September 12, 2011 in Central Intelligence Agency, Libya
These documents concerning CIA rendition of terrorism suspects, with the help of the UK, were recovered from the offices of Libyan intelligence and published by Human Rights Watch.
Libyan Intelligence Service Extraordinary Rendition Documents
4 pages
Secret Releasable Libya Only
1999-2004
Download
Tags: Central Intelligence Agency, Extraordinary rendition, Libya, MI6, Secret, United Kingdom
4 Comments »
Related Material From the Archive:
Documents Detail CIA, MI6 Relationship With Qaddafi
Italy seeks jail for US spies in rendition trial
U.S. Secret Service Requests Removal of Documents from Public Intelligence
Libyan Rebels Reportedly Capture British SAS Team
U.S. Asks Saudi Arabia to Supply Weapons to Libyan Rebels
NATO Commander Discusses “Flickers” of Al-Qaeda Among Libyan Rebels
Billions in Libyan Oil Money Held by Western Banks Like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, HSBC, Societe Generale
Libyan Rebel Photos
(U//FOUO) New Jersey Fusion Center School Shootings Commonalities Analysis January 30, 2013 in Intelligence Fusion Centers, New Jersey
(U//FOUO) New Jersey Fusion Center School Shootings Commonalities Analysis
January 30, 2013 in Intelligence Fusion Centers, New Jersey
New Jersey Regional Operations Intelligence Center School Shootings Commonalities
5 pages
For Official Use Only
November 15, 2012
Download
(U//FOUO) This report attempts to analyze the indicators and commonalities of recent school shootings in an effort to inform public safety officials and assist in the detection and prevention of potential school shooter plots or attacks. All incidents included in this assessment occurred in the United States while classes were in session. Domestic violence shootings and gang violence were not included in an effort to differentiate between “active shooter” incidents and other acts of violence. DHS defines an “active shooter” as an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.
(U//FOUO) Recently several school shooting plots and attacks have occurred throughout the United States, which has resulted in the deaths and injuries of their victims. These incidents included:
January 2011 (Utah) – Law enforcement officers arrested two teenagers after discovering that they planned to bomb their high school. The two suspects had blueprints of the school and planned to escape after their attack by stealing a plane at a nearby airport.
February 2011 (Ohio) – A student killed three classmates and injured two others at a high school when he opened fire in the cafeteria.
April 2012 (California) – A school shooting left seven people dead and three others wounded when a nursing student opened fire at a small Christian college.
October 2012 (Maryland) – A 15-year old high school student shot and critically injured a classmate on the first day of school.
(U//FOUO) One or more plots or shootings have occurred in each of the last 10 years in the United States, resulting in the deaths of students and school administrators. These attacks have occurred at all types of schools, including elementary, high school, college, and other educational institutions. In every instance of a school shooting attack in the United States during this period, the attacker has used small arms or homemade explosives.
…
Use of Social Media
(U//FOUO) In the past several years, the majority of students who have conducted plots or attacks against their schools have publicized their anger or intentions through the use of social media. Not every instance of expression of anger will necessarily result in violence, but when school shootings have occurred, the perpetrators have often previously expressed a fixation with death or inflicting pain on others.
(U//FOUO) While students have used social media to express their anger and intentions to attack their schools, this type of action is neither new nor limited to online activity. Even without the use of online media, students have expressed their frustration and intentions through other outlets by using handwritten journals, notes, and drawings. These documents can indicate pre-operational planning, as illustrated in the 1999 Columbine shooting. Diary entries of the Columbine shooters, released in 2006, not only contained their anger but also reminders to fill ammunition clips and acquire bomb-making materials, including nails, propane, and fuses.
(U//FOUO) Recent examples of students publicizing their intentions to plot or attack their schools include the following:
January 2011 (Nebraska) – A high school student who shot one administrator and killed another posted ominous messages on his Facebook page that read., “You’re gonna hear about the evil [expletive] I did but that [expletive] school drove me to this. I want you guys to remember me for who I was before this. I greatly affected the lives of the families ruined but I’m sorry. Goodbye.” These attacks occurred despite the existence of these postings because friends or family were unaware of these writings until law enforcement investigated the shootings and searched the students’ computers.
February 2012 (Ohio) – Authorities discovered several Facebook postings by a high school student attending Chardon High School after he killed three classmates. One of his Facebook postings read, “He longed for only one thing, the world to bow at his feet,” and ended ominously, “Die, all of you.”
In 2012 law enforcement officers arrested several students after they posted threatening language online. In one instance, in January 2012, two students were arrested for planning to bomb their school after one of them shared their plans with another student, who then informed school officials. When questioned by law enforcement, one of the students stated that not only was the 1999 Columbine High School shooting their inspiration, but also that they hoped to surpass its death toll. This instance and several others in which a concerned student or parent informed the local police department, preventing the attack, demonstrate the importance of reporting suspicious activities.
(U//FOUO) While social media has provided students with a venue to post their anger and intent, the Internet can also provide them with access to violent web sites. Violent online material has the potential to influence an already emotionally troubled student producing sometimes negative and deadly consequences. In 2005 a 16-year old, who posed messages on a neo-Nazi website calling himself the Angel of Death, killed nine people and wounded seven before committing suicide. Some online material can also provide instructions on weapons use and bomb construction.
…
Who are the shooters?
(U//FOUO) In the last 10 years, male students have been responsible for the majority of school shootings nationwide. Students who perpetrated attacks were also more likely to know their intended targets rather than to attack their victims randomly. When students targeted an administrator, they believed that either the school failed to protect them from bullies, or the student felt school officials unfairly reprimanded them.
(U//FOUO) The remaining attackers were outsiders with no relationship to the school or school employees who attacked their supervisors because of employment disputes. One instance of a school employee attacking a school occurred in March 2012, when hours after a teacher was fired, he returned to school and shot dead a school administrator prior to committing suicide. Outsider shooters with no relation to the school, on the other hand, are more likely to attack their victims randomly because these attackers had no discernible association with the school and had no grievances with any potential victims.
(U//FOUO) In 2006, two separate outsider attackers shared similar tactics, one at Platte Canyon High School in Colorado in September, and another at an Amish school at Nickel Mines, PA, in October. In both incidents, the gunmen attacked the schools, took several female students hostage, and killed one or more students, before taking their own lives moments before law enforcement officers broke into the classrooms. The threat from outside attackers is not, however, limited to a gunman entering a school. Shooters have also targeted students by waiting outside the school or near the perimeter during recess or at dismissal.
Tags: Active Shooter, For Official Use Only, Fusion Centers, New Jersey, School shooter
2 Comments »
Related Material From the Archive:
(U//FOUO) New Jersey Fusion Center Mass Shootings Analysis
(U//FOUO) New Jersey Office of Homeland Security School Bomb Plot Warning
(U//FOUO) New Jersey Fusion Center: Attack on Afghan Resort Demonstrates Vulnerability of Hotels
(U//FOUO) New Jersey Fusion Center Incident Assessment: Mass Shooting at Colorado Movie Theater
(U//FOUO) Massachusetts Fusion Center: Schools Receiving White Powder Letters
FBI The School Shooter: A Quick Reference Guide
(U//FOUO) New Jersey Fusion Center Mephedrone or Bath Salts Warning
(U//FOUO) Oregon TITAN Fusion Center: Al-Qaeda Inspire Magazine Analysis
White House Warns: ‘Don’t Photoshop Obama Gun Pic!’
White House Warns: ‘Don’t Photoshop Obama Gun Pic!’
On 02.2.13, in Censorship, Fun, Government, Law, New World Order, Regime, by Sad Hill
obama skeet shooting obama gun control obama shotgun sad hill news2
Cha!
White House Warns: Don’t Photoshop Obama Gun Pic
(Brietbart) The White House has released a picture purporting to show President Obama “skeet shooting” at Camp David. An activity he claims he does “all the time.”
The White House also warns all you mischievous internet types to not mess around with the picture:
“This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.”
~
OK Big Brother, I, Sad Hill, promise not to Photoshop® the publicly-owned image you released of Obama supposedly shooting skeet. That said, I’m still not sure which orientation is the ‘official’ White House version, better post both…
obama skeet shooting obama gun control obama shotgun sad hill news-2
RELOAD!!
Update: Reluxcat just informed me of a Photoshop® contest Maser Media is holding: HERE
Sad Hill’s 2nd entry: HERE
HEY! Be sure to check out The Andrea Shea King Show. She just linked to both of Sad Hill’s Obama ‘skeet shooting’ images: HERE
Double HEY! The Other McCain just linked to this on SHN. Thanks Robert!: HERE
Triple HEY! I Own The World just linked to this on SHN: HERE
Quadruple HEY!: Doug Ross also linked!: HERE
What comes after ‘Quadruple’? HEY!: Thanks for linking, Atlas Shrugs, Daily Paul, The Fine Report, I’m 41, Protein Wisdom, Maser Media, Conservative Compendium, The Conservative Treehouse, Swag Bucks, …
~snip~
The FINAL word on gun control: HERE
Quit your job! Household welfare now $168 per day: HERE
Are there any MEN left in America?!: HERE
Gun control is ‘for the children‘: HERE
The ‘Minutemen Are Turning In Their Graves’: HERE
NORAD and NORTHCOM Operations Plans Summary
NORAD and NORTHCOM Operations Plans Summary
August 4, 2009 in U.S. Northern Command
20080930_Felderman_N-NC_Plans_Summary_Interagency
U.S. Northern Command
BG Bob Felderman, Deputy Director J, Plans, Policy & Strategy
26 pages
For Official Use Only
September 30, 2009
NORAD Missions
• Aerospace Warning: Detect, validate, characterize, assess and warn of attacks against North America, whether by aircraft, missiles or space vehicles
• Aerospace Control: Detect and respond to unauthorized and unwanted air activity approaching or operating within North American airspace
• Maritime Warning: Process, assess and disseminate intelligence/information to warn of maritime threats or attacks against North America
USNORTHCOM Missions
Conduct military operations to:
• Anticipate, deter, prevent and defeat threats to the United States, its territories and interests within assigned area of responsibility
• Provide civil support and other assistance to U.S. civil authorities as directed
…
north Family of Plans
• NC Theater Campaign Plan
• CONPLAN 3310 -Aerospace Defense & Maritime Warning
• CONPLAN 3400 -Homeland Defense
• Combined Defense Plan
• CONPLAN 3475 -Regional War on Terrorism
• CONPLAN 3600 -Emergency Preparedness in the NCR
• CONPLAN 3501 -Defense Support of Civil Authorities
• CONPLAN 3500 -CBRNE Consequence Management
• CONPLAN 3502 -Civil Disturbance Operations
• CANUS Civil Assistance Plan
• CONPLAN 3551 -Pandemic Influenza -Global
• CONPLAN 3591 -Pandemic Influenza -Regional
• CONPLAN 3505 -Nuclear Weapon Accident Response Plan
Theater Campaign Plan
• Purpose: Long-range plan to operationalize the NC Theater Strategy, and synchronize Global and Theater campaign planning, security cooperation, contingency planning, strategic communication, resources and forces
• Highlights:
• Ensures Command objectives aligned with NDS and NMS
• Achieve Guidance for Employment of the Force and JSCP end states
• Link and synchronize steady state, shaping, and security cooperation activities with our contingency plans
• A Capstone document that will drive activities in the HQ’s
…
Emerging National Planning Initiatives
• Homeland Security Presidential Directive 8, Annex I
• Integrated Planning System
• National Homeland Security Plan
• National Interagency Concept Plans
Impacts
• Codified planning processes for Interagency Planning
• National Planning Scenarios binned into 8 mission sets
• Additional appendices to CONPLAN Operations Annex
• CONPLAN 3501 for DSCA
• CONPLAN 3500 for CBRNE-CM
• Possible revisions to CONPLAN 3400 for HD
…
• We at NORAD and USNORTHCOM include:
-US Government, State, Tribal, and Local Agencies (e.g. Dept of Homeland Security, State, Transportation, Health and Human Services, etc)
-Non-Governmental Agencies (e.g. Red Cross, Humanitarian Int’l Service Group, etc)
-Private Sector Organizations (Academic, business, professional)
north2north3north4
Tags: CONPLAN, Disaster Response, Emergency Response, For Official Use Only, NORAD, Operations Plan, U.S. Northern Command
1 Comment »
Related Material From the Archive:
Joint Task Force Civil Support (JTF-CS) Brief
USNORTHCOM Antiterrorism (AT) Operations Order (U) 05-01
United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team Operations
As Israel rages, US plans for Iran war re-emerge
Wal-Mart weighs role in U.S. H1N1 vaccination plans
DOD Directive 3020.26
Montana Vigilant Guard 2009 Exercise
Region XIII+ (MT) MPC Planning Conference
Obama ‘Furious’ Over White House ‘Skeet Shooting’ Photoshops® – Issues Executive Order To Prevent Future
Sunday, February 3, 2013 13:50
inShare
0
(Before It's News)
obama skeet obama skeet shooting obama jay carney white house press sad hill news
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney now wishing he never released the Obama ‘skeet shooting’ photo accompanied by his Big Brother mandate warning to all Photoshoppers® to keep their hands off the publicaly-owned image…
Hat tip: The Fine Report
FULL Story: HERE
Sad Hill’s 1st submission: HERE
Sad Hill’s 2nd submission: HERE
Sad Hill’s 3rd submission: HERE
Sad Hill’s 4th submission: HERE
Sad Hill’s 5th submission: HERE
UPDATE: Thanks for linking, The Other McCain, Doug Ross, I Own The World, Atlas Shrugs, Daily Paul, The Andrea Shea King Show, The Fine Report, I’m 41, Protein Wisdom, Maser Media, Conservative Compendium, The Conservative Treehouse, Swag Bucks, Before It’s News,Ruger Forum, Moonbattery, The Classic Liberal, …
Slice of USNORTHCOM logo for layout purposes Slice of USNORTHCOM banner for layout purposes
FOIA Request Service Center
The HQ U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Service Center is designed to assist the public in making FOIA requests for USNORTHCOM records. The information obtained herein is not intended to be definitive or exhaustive. The FOIA, which is known by its legal cite as Title 5 U.S.C. § 552, along with the Department of Defense (DOD) Regulation 5400.7-R, governs how requests will be processed within USNORTHCOM.
The USNORTHOCM FOIA Request Service Center is the central point of processing of FOIA initial requests from the general public, and consultations from other DOD and Executive Branch Agencies and Departments. To include support of all actions related to FOIA requests submitted by the public for access to records under the control of USNORTHCOM. Our office hours are 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday (Mountain Time). To contact the USNORTHCOM FOIA Request Service Center:
HQ USNORTHCOM/CS
ATTN: FOIA Request Service Center
250 Vandenberg Street Suite B016
Peterson Air Force Base CO 80914-3801
Email: nc.foia.omb@northcom.mil
Click here to visit the USNORTHCOM FOIA Reading Room
Recent Documents
2012 FOIA Logs
Efforts Toward U.S.-Mexican Air Defense Arrangments (1965)
ECCM in NORAD (1963) Release
USNORTHCOM J2 MIP UFR Manpower
Con Plan 3501-08 DSCA
DSCA_pages C_21_1 and 2
2009 US Presidential Inauguration Special Event Assessment
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Freedom of Information Act?
How do I submit a FOIA request to the UNSNORTHOCM/CS FOIA Requester Service Center?
How do I file a FOIA request?
What are the essential elements of a FOIA Request?
Do I have to pay any fees to have a FOIA request processed?
How long will it take to process my request?
What format will be used to provide any documents produced as a result of my request?
What can I do if I am not satisfied with the response that I receive regarding my FOIA request?
If you are concerned with the service provided by USNORTHCOM FOIA Request Service Center, whom can I turn to?
Contact Us
INITIAL REQUESTS
USNORTHCOM FOIA Requester Service Center
250 Vandenberg Street Suite B016
Peterson Air Force Base CO 80914-3801
FOIA LIAISON
If you are not satisfied with the service you received from this Service Center, you may contact
Mr. Jim Hogan, FOIA Liaison Officer, for assistance at (703) 696-4703 or mail to:
Mr. Jim Hogan
Chief, Policy, Appeals, and Litigation Branch
Office of Freedom of Information
1155 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1155
Back
E-mail this page to a friendE-mail this page to a friend
Home
News
Photos
Leaders
About USNORTHCOM
Newcomers
Educational
Employment · Doing Business
Contact USNORTHCOM
Links
Avian Flu
Death 0f America: Leaked US Army Document Outlines Plan for Re-Education Camps in America Video
Sunday, February 3, 2013 6:24
inShare
0
(Before It's News)
A leaked U.S. Army document prepared for the Department of Defense contains shocking plans for "political activists" to be pacified by "PSYOP officers" into developing an "appreciation of U.S. policies" while detained in prison camps inside the United States. Is the current Gun Grab the event that puts this plan into action?
By Their own admission, the manual is real and never meant to be viewed by the public.
Field manual (FM) 3-39.40 is aligned with FM 3-39, the military police keystone FM. FM 3-39.40 provides guidance for commanders and staffs on internment and resettlement (I/R) operations.
This manual addresses I/R operations across the spectrum of conflict, specifically the doctrinal paradigm shift from traditional enemy prisoner of war (EPW) operations to the broader and more inclusive requirements of detainee operations. Additionally, FM 3-39.40 discusses the critical issue of detainee rehabilitation. It describes the doctrinal foundation, principles, and processes that military police and other elements will employ when dealing with I/R populations.
As part of internment, these populations include U.S. military prisoners, and multiple categories of detainees (civilian internees [CIs], retained personnel [RP], and enemy combatants), while resettlement operations are focused on multiple categories of dislocated civilians (DCs). Military police conduct I/R operations during offensive, defensive, stability, or civil unrest support operations.
I have included 3 more Videos and the PDF link to FM3-39.40 at the end of this article for you to review as well. Do your homework and then make your own informed decision.
A leaked U.S. Army document prepared for the Department of Defense contains shocking plans for “political activists” to be pacified by “PSYOP officers” into developing an “appreciation of U.S. policies” while detained in prison camps inside the United States.
The document, entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations (PDF) was originally released on a restricted basis to the DoD in February 2010, but has now been leaked online.
The manual outlines policies for processing detainees into internment camps both globally and inside the United States. International agencies like the UN and the Red Cross are named as partners in addition to domestic federal agencies including the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA.
The document makes it clear that the policies apply “within U.S. territory” and involve, “DOD support to U.S. civil authorities for domestic emergencies, and for designated law enforcement and other activities,” including “man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist attacks and incidents in the U.S. and its territories.”
The manual states, “These operations may be performed as domestic civil support operations,” and adds that “The authority to approve resettlement such operations within U.S. territories,” would require a “special exception” to The Posse Comitatus Act, which can be obtained via “the President invoking his executive authority.” The document also makes reference to identifying detainees using their “social security number.”
Aside from enemy combatants and other classifications of detainees, the manual includes the designation of “civilian internees,” in other words citizens who are detained for, “security reasons, for protection, or because he or she committed an offense against the detaining power.”
Once the detainees have been processed into the internment camp, the manual explains how they will be “indoctrinated,” with a particular focus on targeting political dissidents, into expressing support for U.S. policies.
The re-education process is the responsibility of the “Psychological Operations Officer,” whose job it is to design “PSYOP products that are designed to pacify and acclimate detainees or DCs to accept U.S. I/R facility authority and regulations,” according to the document.
The manual lists the following roles that are designated to the “PSYOP team”.
- Identifies malcontents, trained agitators, and political leaders within the facility who may try to organize resistance or create disturbances.
- Develops and executes indoctrination programs to reduce or remove antagonistic attitudes.
- Identifies political activists.
- Provides loudspeaker support (such as administrative announcements and facility instructions when necessary).
- Helps the military police commander control detainee and DC populations during emergencies.
- Plans and executes a PSYOP program that produces an understanding and appreciation of U.S. policies and actions.
Political activists would be pacified to sympathize with the government.
Remember, this is not restricted to insurgents in Iraq who are detained in prison camps – the manual makes it clear that the policies also apply “within U.S. territory” under the auspices of the DHS and FEMA. The document adds that, “Resettlement operations may require large groups of civilians to be quartered temporarily (less than 6 months) or semipermanently (more than 6 months).”
The historical significance of states using internment camps to re-educate detainees centers around the fact that it is almost exclusively practiced by repressive and dictatorial regimes like the former Soviet Union and Stalinist regimes like modern day North Korea.
We have exhaustively documented preparations for the mass internment of citizens inside America, but this is the first time that language concerning the re-education of detainees, in particular political activists, has cropped up in our research.
In 2009, the National Guard posted a number of job opportunities looking for “Internment/Resettlement Specialists” to work in “civilian internee camps” within the United States.
In December last year it was also revealed that Halliburton subsidiary KBR is seeking sub-contractors to staff and outfit “emergency environment” camps located in five regions of the United States.
In 2006, KBR was contracted by Homeland Security to build detention centers designed to deal with “an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S,” or the rapid development of unspecified “new programs” that would require large numbers of people to be interned.
Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border, the same pretense used in the language of the KBR request for services.
During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by the government to be “national security threats.”
Under the indefinite detention provision of the National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed by Barack Obama on New Year’s Eve, American citizens can be kidnapped and detained indefinitely without trial.
Read a portion of the Internment and Resettlement Operations manual below.
The following portions of the document make it clear that the policies apply “within U.S. territory” (as well as abroad in countries like Iraq and Afghanistan) and that domestic federal agencies are involved.
Army PA Officer proves Internment Resettlement doc is REAL!
This Army officer reads the parts of this document that he feels is the most important parts to be aware of, but make no mistake everyone needs to read this document for themselves and then make your own decisions. You be the judge.
Link to the document here: FM3-39.40 Click Here!
U.S. Army Prison Camps for U.S. Citizens
Red Dawn Re-Education Camps in America Run by "PSYOP Officers" 3/3
Critical Reads: More News Mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)